Monday, June 9, 2014

COURSE OVERVIEW

This site contains all the course documentation, materials, and assignments for USSY 289E: Poets of Ohio taught by Joshua Ware, Ph.D. during Spring semesters 2013 and 2014 at Case Western Reserve University.

The course, generally speaking, seeks to familiarize students with the genre of poetry by, first, establishing stylistic, aesthetic, and conceptualize foundations common to contemporary poetry. To do so, we read scholarly books and critical articles by authors such as Robert Archembeau, Elisa Gabbert, Richard Hugo, Philip Larkin, and James Longenbach.

For the next phase of the course, we read full-length collections by six different Ohio poets. Once students read each collection, they write a 2-page response paper that develops connections between the primary text and secondary sources. During our class sessions, we discuss our thoughts and ideas about the text. The following session, the poet visits campus for a reading and a question-and-answer segment. To this end, we attempt to answer the following questions, which the syllabus' course description poses:
Why do poetic texts, both of the present and the past, seem so difficult to read and understand? What writing techniques, strategies, and styles do poets use that make comprehending their work such a challenge? More importantly, why would anyone choose to write in this manner? Through close reading of our primary texts, researching the historical and literary contexts surrounding contemporary poetry, and discussing the art form with each other (as well as with the poets themselves), we will come to a better understanding of how these texts function.
Ultimately, these writing assignments, discussions, readings, and q-&-a sessions offer students several different learning environments in which to engage, think about, and understand contemporary poetry.

This class is also designed to explore and develop the idea of community, specifically local and regional communities that thrive outside of mainstream culture. As the course description in the syllabus also states that:
But more than just acquainting you with this style of writing, our course will highlight the large and dynamic poetry community of Ohio. Luckily for us, many of the poets we will read during the course agreed to visit our class this semester to talk about their work and read their poems. 
To this extent, our course will explore the local and national poetry communities, noting how writers found relationships upon geography, aesthetics, and demographics (just to name a few), using written texts to express emotion, thought, or identity. In order to accomplish these goals, we will read, participate in class discussions, and write extensively about poetry composed by contemporary Ohio poets. Therefore, you will be expected to engage our course texts critically, thinking through the manner in which language operates as a tool for generating and sustaining, as well as undermining, community formation.
It is a goal of this course, then, not just to acquaint students with contemporary poetry, but challenge them to consider about how we can become proactive leaders and supportive members within marginalized communities.

For more information on this course, please explore this blog. You can also check out videos of and commentary by the poets from our first-year readers on Vouched Books by clicking on their names: Mary BiddingerPhil MetresFrank GiampietroDana WardCathy Wagner, and Sarah Gridley; likewise, Vouched Books also hosts excerpts from my introductions and videos of our second-year readers: Catherine Wing, Matt Hart, Heather Christle, Dave Lucas, Tyrone Williams, and Larissa Szporluk.

Monday, April 21, 2014

FINAL RESEARCH ESSAY

DUE: THURSDAY, 08 MAY 2014. 8am. NO LATE ESSAYS ACCEPTED.

OVERVIEW:

Your final project provides you with an opportunity to explore a topic you find interesting that relates to contemporary poetry being composed by poets living and writing in Ohio. The essay should offers you the chance to consider the different perspectives, arguments, and contexts that shape your subject matter, tell a certain history, or persuade an audience in a certain way.

Your task, then, will be to write a research essay in your own academic voice, integrating primary and secondary source material, and employing argumentative strategies. The paper should be a persuasive argument (not a report), but you are free to take whatever angle you choose. That is, you are free to develop your own position and solutions, etc. As you are already well aware, you need to conduct research and rely upon a significant body of source material in the form of articles, books, interviews, field research, surveys, and other secondary sources.

LENGTH & FORMAT:

The paper should be 10-12 double-spaced pages that are typed in 12-point Times New Roman font and formatted according to proper academic conventions. You will use MLA-style in order to learn the standard documentation convention for writing in academic world. The first page of your document should have a heading that is properly formatted and include a relevant title. Each subsequent page should have your last name and the page number in the upper right corner (in the header), and you should include a separate Works Cited in which you identify all referenced texts.

SUBJECT SPECIFICS:

Your paper must be an argument, not a report. In other words, the entire essay should be designed to support a thesis statement through strategic use of your research and through effective use of argumentative strategies. To this extent, you should consider how to integrate effectively the multiple sources, perspectives, arguments you have been researching. I will meet with each one of you in one-on-one session to help you further refine your topic so that it is both relevant for this course and manageable for a project of this scope. Also, look to see that you have incorporated the following in the paper itself:
A strong, unique, specific, and compelling thesis

A fully developed introduction, body, and conclusion

Strategic use of argumentation 
Strategic incorporation of your research as a means to support your claims through evidence (primary and secondary sources, interviews, statistics, analogies, examples, etc.) 
If pertinent to your subject: Visual rhetoric, or how visual mediate, shape, create a particular controversy, situation, issue, or phenomenon. Visual rhetoric should be both the lens of analysis and the key primary source focus 
An articulation of the context and significance of this problem 
Development of your persona and a strong statement of your purpose

The proposal of some kind of solution to the problem at hand or the delineation of a new way of looking at the issue 
Organization of your writing with attention to overall coherence, transitions, balance between parts, and the relationship of part to whole 
Understanding of the conventions of academic discourse (correct usage, diction, syntax, grammar, and documentation format) 
Documentation of sources cited using MLA style (or APA) in the body and the Works Cited page 
Insertion of images according to academic convention 
No typos, careless errors, or proofreading mistakes that decrease credibility and destroy ethos

Friday, April 4, 2014

Larissa Szporluk Reading

What: Larissa Szporluk Poetry Reading and Discussion
Date: Thursday, 10 April 2014
Time: 6:00pm – 7:15pm
Location: Case Western Reserve University Room: Clark Hall, Room 206 (map)

Join us for an evening of poetry with Larissa Szporluk, which will be the final event of the semester for the Poets of Ohio reading series.

Szporluk will read from her most recent collection Traffic with MacBeth (Tupelo Press, 2011), as well as other work. Her performance will be followed by a question-and-answer session.

The event is free and open to the public. This and previous readings have been made possible by the support of the Helen B. Sharnoff Committee, the Baker-Nord Center for the Humanities, as well as the English and SAGES Departments.

It would be very much appreciated if you could spread this announcement and/or word of the event over the course of the next few days.

Larissa Szporluk was raised in Ann Arbor, Michigan and earned degrees at the University of Michigan, the University of California-Berkeley, and the University of Virginia, where she was a Henry Hoyns fellow. Her books of poetry include Dark Sky Question (1998), which won the Barnard Poetry Prize; Isolato (2000), winner of the Iowa Poetry Prize; The Wind, Master Cherry, the Wind (2003); Embryos and Idiots (2007); and Traffic with Macbeth (2011). She has received grants from the National Endowment for the Arts, and currently teaches at Bowling Green State University.

UPDATE: 04 APRIL 2014

For next class session, please read Larissa Szporluk's Traffic with MacBeth (Tupelo Press, 2011) and be prepared to discuss the collection.

Additionally, you will need to turn in a hard-copy of a typed, two-page, double-space response to the book. Your response essay should engage Szporluk's book using one of the critical articles, essays, or chapters we've read so far this semester. To do so, please look at how writers such as Stephen Burt, Richard Hugo, Philip Larkin, James Longenbach, Richard Archambeau, or Elisa Gabbert critically engage with a poem. Think of their writing as a model for how you can approach Szporluk's book. Ultimately, you'll want to provide a close reading of one of two poems in the collection that are emblematic of Traffic with MacBeth's broader concerns or aesthetic traits.

In addition to being two-pages, double-spaced and typed, your responses should be in 12-point Times New Roman font with standard one inch margins. Your name should appear in the top, right-hand corner and the essay should be formatted according to MLA-stlye guidelines. To this end, you should be properly quoting both Szporluk's book and at least one of the articles.

By Wednesday 26 March at 12pm, everyone should email three questions that they would like to ask Szporluk after her reading. These questions should engage her poems and the critical readings directly; moreover, they should be formed in such a manner that they will prompt extended discussion, not just "Yes" or "No" answers. I will read over your questions and provide feedback for how they can be improved. You will be expected to ask all the poets questions after their readings.

On Tuesday 18 March, instead of having a regular class session, Larissa Szporluk will be reading. I will provide more information regarding the reading over spring break via email.

Friday, March 28, 2014

UPDATE: 28 MAR 2014

Instead of meeting as a class next week, I will conference with each one of you individually for 30 minutes regarding your final research topics and essays. These conferences are not optional.

Conferences will be held on Tuesdays and Thursdays. It would be most expedient to schedule an appointment with me through the Writing Resource Center's website during my tutoring hours, which I hold from 10am - 12:30pm. If you are not available during these time-slots, I can also meet with you on Tuesday from 3pm-5:30pm, or Thursday from 2pm-5:30pm.

If the only time you can meet you can meet is during our class period, please let me know and we can make arrangements.

If you schedule an appointment through the WRC's website, please send me an email informing me of this fact; otherwise, send me an email with three possible time-slots in the next 24 hours.

During the conference, please bring your Research Proposal that I commented on and additional research or sources you've found. Please, come prepared to talk about your topic at length. I will expect you to lead these discussions, as well as have a series of questions, comments, and concerns that you would like to address.

Below is the revised schedule with due dates:

REVISED SCHEDULE FOR USSYE 289: POETS OF OHIO
Tuesday, 01 April:Individual Conferences
Thursday, 03 April:Individual Conferences
Tuesday, 08 April:Szporluk Discussion and Response Essay
Thursday, 10 April:Szporluk Reading
Tuesday, 15 April:Annotated Bibliography (with Proposal) due
Tuesday, 22 April:Course Wrap-up and Evaluations
Thursday, 08 May:Final Research Essay due @ 8am

Friday, March 21, 2014

TYRONE WILLIAMS POETRY READING

What: Tyrone Williams Poetry Reading and Discussion
Date: Thursday, 27 March 2014
Time: 6:00pm – 7:15pm
Location: Case Western Reserve University Room: Guilford Hall Parlor(map)

Join us for an evening of poetry with Tyrone Williams. He will read from his most recent collection Adventures of Pi (Dos Madres Press, 2011), as well as other work. His performance will be followed by a question-and-answer session.

This event is free and open to the public.

It would be very much appreciated if you could spread this announcement and/or word of the event over the course of the next few days.

Tyrone Williams teaches literature and theory at Xavier University in Cincinnati, Ohio. He is the author of five books of poetry, c.c. (Krupskaya Books, 2002), On Spec (Omnidawn Publishing, 2008), The Hero Project of the Century (The Backwaters Press, 2009), Adventures of Pi (Dos Madres Press, 2011) and Howell (Atelos Books, 2011). He is also the author of several chapbooks, including a prose eulogy, Pink Tie (Hooke Press, 2011). His website is at http://home.earthlink.net/~suspend/

UPDATE 21 MAR 2014

For next class session, please read Tyrone Williams' Adventures in Pi (Dos Madres Press, 2011) and be prepared to discuss the collection.

Additionally, you will need to turn in a hard-copy of a typed, two-page, double-space response to the book. Your response essay should engage Williams' book using one of the critical articles, essays, or chapters we've read so far this semester. To do so, please look at how writers such as Stephen Burt, Richard Hugo, Philip Larkin, James Longenbach, Richard Archambeau, or Elisa Gabbert critically engage with a poem. Think of their writing as a model for how you can approach Williams' book. Ultimately, you'll want to provide a close reading of one of two poems in the collection that are emblematic of Adventures in Pi's broader concerns or aesthetic traits.

In addition to being two-pages, double-spaced and typed, your responses should be in 12-point Times New Roman font with standard one inch margins. Your name should appear in the top, right-hand corner and the essay should be formatted according to MLA-stlye guidelines. To this end, you should be properly quoting both Williams' book and at least one of the articles.

By Wednesday 26 March at 12pm, everyone should email three questions that they would like to ask Williams after her reading. These questions should engage his poems and the critical readings directly; moreover, they should be formed in such a manner that they will prompt extended discussion, not just "Yes" or "No" answers. I will read over your questions and provide feedback for how they can be improved. You will be expected to ask all the poets questions after their readings.

On Tuesday 18 March, instead of having a regular class session, Tyrone Williams will be reading. I will provide more information regarding the reading over spring break via email.

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Dave Lucas Poetry Reading

What: Dave Lucas Poetry Reading and Discussion
Date: Tuesday, 18 March 2014
Time: 6:00pm – 7:15pm
Location: Case Western Reserve University Room: Guilford Hall Parlor(map)

Join us for an evening of poetry with Dave Lucas. He will read from his most recent collection Weather (University of Georgia Press, 2011), as well as other work. His performance will be followed by a question-and-answer session.

This event is free and open to the public.

It would be very much appreciated if you could spread this announcement and/or word of the event over the course of the next few days.

Dave Lucas is the author of Weather (Georgia, 2011), which received the 2012 Ohioana Book Award for Poetry, and is a co-founder and co-curator of the Brews + Prose literary series at Market Garden Brewery. Recently Rita Dove selected him to be featured on BillMoyers.com as a “young poet to watch.” A PhD candidate in English at the University of Michigan, he lives in Cleveland, where he was born and raised.

Friday, February 28, 2014

UPDATE: 28 FEB 2014

For next class session, please read Dave Lucas' Weather (University of Georgia Press, 2011) and be prepared to discuss the collection.

Additionally, you will need to turn in a hard-copy of a typed, two-page, double-space response to the book. Your response essay should engage Lucas' book using one of the critical articles, essays, or chapters we've read so far this semester. To do so, please look at how writers such as Stephen Burt, Richard Hugo, Philip Larkin, James Longenbach, Richard Archambeau, or Elisa Gabbert critically engage with a poem. Think of their writing as a model for how you can approach Lucas' book. Ultimately, you'll want to provide a close reading of one of two poems in the collection that are emblematic of Weather's broader concerns or aesthetic traits.

In addition to being two-pages, double-spaced and typed, your responses should be in 12-point Times New Roman font with standard one inch margins. You name should appear in the top, right-hand corner and the essay should be formatted according to MLA-stlye guidelines. To this end, you should be properly quoting both Lucas' book and at least one of the articles.

By Monday 17 March at 12pm, everyone should email three questions that they would like to ask Lucas after her reading. These questions should engage his poems and the critical readings directly; moreover, they should be formed in such a manner that they will prompt extended discussion, not just "Yes" or "No" answers. I will read over your questions and provide feedback for how they can be improved. You will be expected to ask all the poets questions after their readings.

On Tuesday 18 March, instead of having a regular class session, Dave Lucas will be reading. I will provide more information regarding the reading over spring break via email.

Saturday, February 22, 2014

UPDATE: 22 FEB 2014

For Tuesday's class session, please read the second chapter from Richard Hugo's The Triggering Town: Lectures and Essays on Poetry and Writing (it begins on page 11) and Stephen Burt's essay "'LIKE' A speculative essay about poetry, simile, artificial intelligence, mourning, sex, rock and roll, grammar, romantic love."

As with the previous reading assignments, please come prepared for a short quiz at the beginning of class and a discussion of the texts.

Hugo's essay can be found on Blackboard and Burt's essay can be found online at the American Poetry Review's website.

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

UPDATE 18 FEB 2014

For Thursday's class session, please read the third excerpt from James Longenbach's The Resistance to Poetry (i.e. Chapter III: Forms of Disjunction) and the Philip Larkin essay "The Pleasure Principle."

As with the previous reading assignments, please come prepared for a short quiz at the beginning of class and a discussion of the texts.

Both essays can be found on Blackboard.

Research Proposal & Annotated Bibliography

DUE DATES: 18 March 2014 (Proposal) / 03 APRIL 03 2014 (Annotated Bibliography)
POINT ALLOTMENT: 20 Points

For this assignment, you will write a brief proposal that outlines the focus of your research and compile an annotated bibliography that contains the sources you will use for your final research essay.

PROPOSAL:

The proposal is a type of promise (to yourself and your instructors) that will guide you through the research process and development of a research-based argument. In all likelihood, as you conduct your research, your topic will modify in some way. This is perfectly acceptable and is, in fact, normal.

A wide variety of disciplines and professions use proposals as a means of developing agendas for research communities, securing funding for studies, publicizing plans for inquiry, and field research, and testing the interest of potential audiences in a given project. Therefore, the genre, organization, and contents of the research proposal differ in many important ways from other types popular and academic writing. In the proposal, you need to explain your interest in your chosen subject and establish a set of questions to guide your inquiry.

Your proposal for this course should contain the following elements:

1) An introduction that clearly states and describes your topic, outlines your purpose, and identifies the conversation you’ve entered. You should develop a working thesis; this tentative statement will help you navigate sources more effectively and assist with time management. But remember” be prepared to change your thesis as often as an honest interpretation of the data demands.

2) Provide background on your topic and what you know so far. Acknowledging how little you know can be an effective rhetorical move, for it demonstrates your need to conduct research. Of course, you should undertake preliminary research that you will incorporate and properly site in this section. Therefore, please integrate 2-3 reputable and relevant sources in your proposal.

3) Identify a series of research question that will inform your project and explain them in your proposal. While you, no doubt, will pose some general questions, make sure that you develop a series of specific and relevant (thus helpful) question in order to guide and focus your next stage of research.

4) Determine and articulate the purpose or goal of this research: Why are you researching this particular topic? Why do you feel compelled to study this topic further? Whom do you hope to persuade? What is the significance of this work?

This aspect of your assignment should be approximately three pages in length, double-spaced and typed in 12-point, Times New Roman font.

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY:

You will follow your proposal with an annotated bibliography, which is a list of MLA-style citations for books, articles, websites, etc. Each citation is followed by a paragraph-long description and evaluation of the source.

Before you begin writing your annotated bibliography, you will need to narrow down your research topic. A good annotated bibliography includes only those sources that directly relate to your narrowed, focused research question. To this extent, you want to ask yourself: What specific questions do I have about my topic that I would like to answer through research? Any one of those questions would likely be a suitable research topic.

Once you have decided on a focused research question, you may begin collecting sources for your annotated bibliography. The bibliography itself will consist of eight secondary sources, which are listed below by type (along with the rules to follow). You must have eight sources:

At least two books: this includes anthologies, but not books printed solely on the Internet (i.e. if the book is online, it must have appeared in print first).

At least four essays or articles from journals, magazines or newspapers: You should find these in databases, and if there is a link to full text, that’s okay. Otherwise, use Inter-Library Loan or get them out at our library.

As mentioned previously, each source in an annotated bibliography requires the following material:

First, describe or summarize the main points made in the book, article, on the webpage, etc. You should discuss the central theme of the source, the thesis, the audience it is trying to reach (if possible), etc.

Second, you will need to evaluate the source. Your evaluation should include why the source and the author are credible, how the source is relevant to your narrowed research question, and how you evaluate the source (i.e. Is it good, bad, boring, interesting, too simple, too complex, etc?)

While you may include the texts we've read in this course in your final essay, please do not include them in your annotated bibliography. The sources you summarize and evaluate should stem from your own, independent research on your specific topic.

This aspect of your assignment should be approximately eight pages in length, double-spaced and typed in 12-point, Times New Roman font.

Each of the sources must be formatted to MLA specifications.

Friday, February 7, 2014

Heather Christle Reading

What: Heather Christle Poetry Reading and Discussion
Date: Thursday, 13 February 2014
Time: 6:00pm – 7:15pm
Location: Case Western Reserve University
Room: Clarke Hall, Room 206 (map)

In conjunction with the Baker-Nord Center for the Humanities, the Helen B. Sharnoff Poetry Fund, and the SAGES and English Departments, please join us for an evening of poetry with Heather Christle.

Christle will read from her collection The Trees The Trees (Octopus Books, 2011), as well as other work. Her performance will be followed by a question-and-answer session.

This event is free and open to the public.

It would be very much appreciated if you could spread this announcement and/or word of the event over the course of the next few days.

Heather Christle is the author of What Is Amazing (Wesleyan University Press, 2012), The Difficult Farm (Octopus Books, 2009), and The Trees The Trees (Octopus Books, 2011), which won the 2012 Believer Poetry Award. Her poems have appeared in publications including Boston Review, Gulf Coast, The New Yorker, and The Best American Poetry. She has taught poetry at Antioch College, Sarah Lawrence College, the University of Massachusetts Amherst and Emory University, where she was the 2009-2011 Poetry Writing Fellow. She is the Web Editor for jubilat and frequently a writer in residence at the Juniper Summer Writing Institute. A native of Wolfeboro, New Hampshire, she lives in Yellow Springs, Ohio.

UPDATE: 07 FEB 2014

For next class session, please read Heather Christle's The Trees The Trees (Octopus Books, 2011) and be prepared to discuss the collection.

Additionally, you will need to turn in a hard-copy of a typed, two-page, double-space response to the book. Your response essay should engage Christle's book using one of the critical articles, essays, or chapters we've read so far this semester. To do so, please look at how writers such as Stephen Burt, James Longenbach, Richard Archambeau, or Elisa Gabbert critically engage with a poem. Think of their writing as a model for how you can approach Christe's book. Ultimately, you'll want to provide a close reading of one of two poems in the collection that are emblematic of The Trees The Tree's broader concerns or aesthetic traits.

In addition to being two-pages, double-spaced and typed, your responses should be in 12-point Times New Roman font with standard one inch margins. You name should appear in the top, right-hand corner and the essay should be formatted according to MLA-stlye guidelines. To this end, you should be properly quoting  both Chistle's book and at least one of the articles.

By Wednesday at 4pm, everyone should email three questions that they would like to ask Christle after her reading. These questions should engage her poems and the critical readings directly; moreover, they should be formed in such a manner that they will prompt extended discussion, not just "Yes" or "No" answers. I will read over your questions and provide feedback for how they can be improved. You will be expected to ask all the poets questions after their readings.

On Thursday, instead of having a regular class session, Heather Christle will be reading. I will provide more information regarding the reading in Tuesday's class session.

Sunday, February 2, 2014

Matt Hart Poetry Reading

What: Matt Hart Poetry Reading and Discussion
Date: Thursday, 06 February 2014
Time: 6:00pm – 7:15pm
Location: Case Western Reserve University
Room: Guilford Hall Parlor 206 (map)

--Please note that this reading will not be held in the same room as last week's reading.

Join us for an evening of poetry with Matt Hart. He will read from her most recent collection Debacle Debacle (H_ NGM_N Books, 2013), as well as other work. His performance will be followed by a question-and-answer session. This event is free and open to the public. It would be very much appreciated if you could spread this announcement and/or word of the event over the course of the next few days.

Matt Hart is the author of five books of poems, Who's Who Vivid (Slope Editions, 2006), Wolf Face (H_NGM_N Books, 2010), Light-Headed (BlazeVOX, 2011), Sermons and Lectures Both Blank and Relentless (Typecast Publishing, 2012), and Debacle Debacle (H_NGM_N Books, 2013), as well as several chapbooks. Additionally, his poems, reviews, and essays have appeared in numerous print and online journals, including Big Bell, Cincinnati Review, Coldfront, Columbia Poetry Review, H_NGM_N, Harvard Review, jubilat, Lungfull!, and Post Road, among others. His awards include a Pushcart Prize, a 2013 individual artist grant from The Shifting Foundation, and fellowships from both the Bread Loaf Writers’ Conference and the Warren Wilson College MFA Program for Writers. A co-founder and the editor-in-chief of Forklift, Ohio: A Journal of Poetry, Cooking & Light Industrial Safety, he lives in Cincinnati where he teaches at the Art Academy of Cincinnati and plays in the band TRAVEL.

Friday, January 31, 2014

UPDATE: 31 JAN 2014

For next class session, please read Matt Hart's Debacle Debacle (H_NGM_N Books, 2013) and be prepared to discuss the collection.

Additionally, you will need to turn in a hard-copy of a typed, two-page, double-space response to the book. Your response essay should engage Hart's book using one of the critical articles, essays, or chapters we've read so far this semester. To do so, please look at how writers such as Stephen Burt, James Longenbach, or Elisa Gabbert critically engage with a poem. Think of their writing as a model for how you can approach Hart's book. Ultimately, you'll want to provide a close reading of one of two poems in the collection that are emblematic of Debacle Debacle's broader concerns or aesthetic traits.

In addition to being two-pages, double-spaced and typed, your responses should be in 12-point Times New Roman font with standard one inch margins. You name should appear in the top, right-hand corner and the essay should be formatted according to MLA-stlye guidelines. To this end, you should be properly quoting  both Hart's book and at least one of the articles.

By Wednesday at 4pm, everyone should email three questions that they would like to ask Hart after his reading. These questions should engage his poems and the critical readings directly; moreover, they should be formed in such a manner that they will prompt extended discussion, not just "Yes" or "No" answers. I will read over your questions and provide feedback for how they can be improved. You will be expected to ask all the poets questions after their readings.

On Thursday, instead of having a regular class session, Matt Hart will be reading. I will provide more information regarding the reading in Tuesday's class session.

Monday, January 27, 2014

Catherine Wing Poetry Reading

What: Catherine Wing Poetry Reading and Discussion
Date: Thursday, 30 January 2014
Time: 6:00pm – 7:15pm
Location: Case Western Reserve University
Room: Clarke Hall 206 (map)

Please join us for an evening of poetry with Catherine Wing. She will read from her most recent collection Gin & Bleach (Sarabande Books, 2012), as well as other work. Her performance will be followed by a question-and-answer session. This event is free and open to the public. It would be very much appreciated if you could spread this announcement and/or word of the event over the course of the next few days.

Catherine Wing was born in Louisville, Kentucky, and attended Brown University before earning her MFA from the University of Washington. Her collections of poetry include Enter Invisible (2005), nominated for the Los Angeles Times Book Prize, and Gin & Bleach (2012). Her poetry has appeared in such journals as Poetry, the Nation, and the Chicago Review and has been featured in a number of anthologies, including Best American Poetry (2010). Wing has received fellowships and residencies from Yaddo, the MacDowell Colony, and the Sewanee Writers’ Conference and teaches poetry at Kent State.

Friday, January 24, 2014

UPDATE: 24 JAN 2014

For next class session, please read Catherine Wing's Gin & Bleach (Sarabande Books, 2012) and be prepared to discuss the collection.

Additionally, you will need to turn in a hard-copy of a typed, two-page, double-space response to the book. Your response essay should engage Wing's book using one of the critical articles, essays, or chapters we've read so far this semester. To do so, please look at how writers such as Stephen Burt, James Longenbach, or Elisa Gabbert critically engage with a poem. Think of their writing as a model for how you can approach Wing's book. Ultimately, you'll want to provide a close reading of one of two poems in the collection that are emblematic of Gin & Bleach's broader concerns or aesthetic traits.

In addition to being two-pages, double-spaced and typed, your responses should be in 12-point Times New Roman font with standard one inch margins. You name should appear in the top, right-hand corner and the essay should be formatted according to MLA-stlye guidelines. To this end, you should be properly quoting  both Wing's book and at least one of the articles.

By Wednesday at 4pm, everyone should email three questions that they would like to ask Wing after her reading. These questions should engage her poems and the critical readings directly; moreover, they should be formed in such a manner that they will prompt extended discussion, not just "Yes" or "No" answers. I will read over your questions and provide feedback for how they can be improved. You will be expected to ask all the poets questions after their readings.

On Thursday, instead of having a regular class session, Catherine Wing will be reading. I will provide more information regarding the reading in Tuesday's class session.

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

UPDATE: 22 JAN 2014

For tomorrow's class session, please read the Elisa Gabbert essay, titled "The Moves: Common Maneuvers in Contemporary Poetry," as well as the second excerpt from James Longenbach's The Resistance to Poetry (i.e. Chapter IV: Song and Story).

As with the previous reading assignments, please come prepared for a short quiz at the beginning of class and a discussion of the texts. 

Both essays can be found on Blackboard.

Thursday, January 16, 2014

UPDATE: 16 JAN 2014

For next Tuesday's class session (i.e. Tuesday, 21 Jan), please read the two excerpts from the poet and critic Stephen Burt's Close Calls with Nonsense, which you can find on Blackboard. These two excerpts are the introduction and conclusion to his book and provide his general assessments of how one engages contemporary poetry.

As with our last class session, there will be a brief quiz on this material at the beginning of the period. Moreover, please come prepared to discuss the excerpts. You all did a fine job during our last session, so keep up the good work.