Friday, May 24, 2013

COURSE OVERVIEW

This site contains all the course documentation, materials, and assignments for USSY 289E: Poets of Ohio taught by Joshua Ware, Ph.D. during Spring semester 2013 at Case Western Reserve University. Due to the blog format, all information reads in reverse chronological order.

The course, generally speaking, sought to familiarize students with the genre of poetry, first by establishing stylistic, aesthetic, and conceptualize foundations common to contemporary poetry. To do so, we read James Longenbach's The Resistance to Poetry, coupled with individual poems written by a wide variety of Ohio poets.

For the next phase of the course, we read full-length collections by six different Ohio poets. Once they read each collection, students wrote a 2-page response paper that developed connections between the primary text and Longenbach's book. During our class sessions, we discussed their thoughts and ideas about the text. The following session, the poet would come to campus for a reading and a question-and-answer segment. To this end, we attempted to answer the following questions, which the syllabus' course description posed:
Why do poetic texts, both of the present and the past, seem so difficult to read and understand? What writing techniques, strategies, and styles do poets use that make comprehending their work such a challenge? More importantly, why would anyone choose to write in this manner? Through close reading of our primary texts, researching the historical and literary contexts surrounding contemporary poetry, and discussing the art form with each other (as well as with the poets themselves), we will come to a better understanding of how these texts function.
Ultimately, these writing assignments, discussions, readings, and q-&-a sessions offered students several different learning environments in which to engage, think about, and understand contemporary poetry.

This class was also designed to explore and develop the idea of community, specifically local and regional communities that thrive outside of mainstream culture. As the course description in the syllabus also states that:
But more than just acquainting you with this style of writing, our course will highlight the large and dynamic poetry community of Ohio. Luckily for us, many of the poets we will read during the course agreed to visit our class this semester to talk about their work and read their poems. 
To this extent, our course will explore the local and national poetry communities, noting how writers found relationships upon geography, aesthetics, and demographics (just to name a few), using written texts to express emotion, thought, or identity. In order to accomplish these goals, we will read, participate in class discussions, and write extensively about poetry composed by contemporary Ohio poets. Therefore, you will be expected to engage our course texts critically, thinking through the manner in which language operates as a tool for generating and sustaining, as well as undermining, community formation.
It was a goal of this course, then, not just to acquaint students with contemporary poetry, but challenge them to consider about how we can become proactive leaders and supportive members within marginalized communities.

For more information on this course, please explore this blog. You can also check out videos of and commentary by the poets on Vouched Books website by clicking on their names: Mary Biddinger, Phil Metres, Frank Giampietro, Dana Ward, Cathy Wagner, and Sarah Gridley.

FINAL RESEARCH ESSAY

DUE: 02 MAY 2012

OVERVIEW:

Your final project presents you with an opportunity to explore a topic you find interesting that relates to contemporary poetry being composed by poets living and writing in Ohio. The essay should provide you the chance to consider different the perspectives, arguments, and contexts that shape your subject matter, tell a certain history, or persuade an audience in a certain way.Your task will be to write a research essay in your own academic voice, integrating primary and secondary source material, and employing argumentative strategies. The paper should be a persuasive argument, but you are free to take whatever angle you choose. That is, you are free to develop your own position and solutions, etc. As you are already well aware, you need to conduct research and rely upon a significant body of source material in the form of articles, books, interviews, field research, surveys, and other secondary sources.

LENGTH & FORMAT:

The paper should be 10-12 double-spaced pages that are typed in 12-point Times New Roman font and formatted according to proper academic conventions. You will use MLA style in order to learn the standard documentation convention for writing in academic world. The first page of your document should have a heading that is properly formatted and include a relevant title. Each subsequent page should have your last name and the page number in the upper right corner (in the header), and you should include a separate Works Cited in which you identify all referenced texts.

SUBJECT SPECIFICS:

Your paper must be an argument, not a report. In other words, the entire essay should be designed to support a thesis statement through strategic use of your research and through effective use of argumentative strategies. To this extent, you should consider how to integrate effectively the multiple sources, perspectives, arguments you have been researching. I will meet with each one of you in one-on-one session to help you further refine your topic so that it is both relevant for this course and manageable for a project of this scope. Also, look to see that you have incorporated the following in the paper itself: 

A strong, unique, specific, and compelling thesis 
A fully developed introduction, body, and conclusion 
Strategic use of argumentation 
Strategic incorporation of your research as a means to support your claims through evidence (primary and secondary sources, interviews, statistics, analogies, examples, etc.) 
If pertinent to your subject: Visual rhetoric, or how visual mediate, shape, create a particular controversy, situation, issue, or phenomenon. Visual rhetoric should be both the lens of analysis and the key primary source focus 
An articulation of the context and significance of this problem

Development of your persona and a strong statement of your purpose 
The proposal of some kind of solution to the problem at hand or the delineation of a new way of looking at the issue 
Organization of your writing with attention to overall coherence, transitions, balance between parts, and the relationship of part to whole 
Understanding of the conventions of academic discourse (correct usage, diction, syntax, grammar, and documentation format) 
Documentation of sources cited using MLA style (or APA) in the body and the Works Cited page 
Insertion of images according to academic convention (Figure 1, etc.) and printed in clear ink, clean paper, in color 
No typos, careless errors, or proofreading mistakes that decrease credibility and destroy ethos

Sunday, April 14, 2013

UPDATE: 04/14/13

For our Tuesday, April 16 class session, please read Sarah Gridley’s book Loom (Omnidawn Publishing, 2013). While reading, think about how both the book and individual poems therein engage the concepts we’ve covered in James Longenbach’s The Resistance to Poetry. Make sure you’re annotating the poems and taking notes as you read.

After finishing the collection, you will need to write a response essay that addresses how Gridley’s poems and Longenbach’s ideas relate to one another. Choose one concept from Longenbach and focus on how it manifests itself in Loom. The choice of what concept you select is up to you, but make sure it’s one that appears with some frequency (and, also, one you have not yet written about). I would suggest returning to Longenbach not just as a reference, but to examine how he engages, analyzes, and writes about poems on a formal level. When engaging a poem or poems from Wagner’s collection, make sure to be explicit about how that concept operates in the excerpt you’ve selected.

Responses will be 2 full pages, double spaced, and typed in 12-point Times New Roman font with one inch margins. You should properly cite from both Loom and The Resistance to Poetry, using MLA-format. All essays will be due at the beginning of our class session. No late assignments will be accepted.

For Wednessday, April 17 (the day after our Tuesday class session and before the reading during our Thursday session), you will need to send me an email that contains three questions for Gridley based upon her book or our in-class discussions. Not only are writing these questions part of your grade, so is asking them after the reading. If you haven’t asked three questions yet this semester, make sure you ask one at Thursday’s reading.

Please email me if you have any questions. Also, please spread the word about Thursday’s reading and invite friends if you would like, as it is open to the public.

Sunday, March 31, 2013

UPDATE: 03/31/13


First, I want you all to know that the revised due date for the Research Proposal is Thursday, April 11. In addition to the project guidelines, please read Chapter 4 from Envision that I posted in the Documents section on Blackboard to get a better sense of what a research proposal entails.

Next, for our Tuesday, April 02 class session, please read Cathy Wagner’s book Nervous Device (City Lights Books, 2012). While reading, think about how both the book and individual poems therein engage the concepts we’ve covered in James Longenbach’s The Resistance to Poetry. Make sure you’re annotating the poems and taking notes as you read.

After finishing the collection, you will need to write a response essay that addresses how Wagner’s poems and Longenbach’s ideas relate to one another. Choose one concept from Longenbach and focus on how it manifests itself in Nervous Device. The choice of what concept you select is up to you, but make sure it’s one that appears with some frequency (and, also, one you have not yet written about). I would suggest returning to Longenbach not just as a reference, but to examine how he engages, analyzes, and writes about poems on a formal level. When engaging a poem or poems from Wagner’s collection, make sure to be explicit about how that concept operates in the excerpt you’ve selected.

Responses will be 2 full pages, double spaced, and typed in 12-point Times New Roman font with one inch margins. You should properly cite from both Nervous Device and The Resistance to Poetry, using MLA-format. All essays will be due at the beginning of our class session. No late assignments will be accepted.

For Wednessday, April 03 (the day after our Tuesday class session and before the reading during our Thursday session), you will need to send me an email that contains three questions for Wagner based upon her book or our in-class discussions. Not only are writing these questions part of your grade, so is asking them after the reading.

Please email me if you have any questions. Also, please spread the word about Thursday’s reading and invite friends if you would like, as it is open to the public.

Sunday, March 24, 2013

UPDATE: 03/24/13

For our Tuesday, March 26 class session, please read Dana Ward’s book This Can’t Be Life (Edge Books, 2012). While reading, think about how both the book and individual poems therein engage the concepts we’ve covered in James Longenbach’s The Resistance to Poetry. Make sure you’re annotating the poems and taking notes as you read.

After finishing the collection, you will need to write a response essay that addresses how Ward’s poems and Longenbach’s ideas relate to one another. Choose one concept from Longenbach and focus on how it manifests itself in This Can’t Be Life. The choice of what concept you select is up to you, but make sure it’s one that appears with some frequency (and, also, one you have not yet written about). I would suggest returning to Longenbach not just as a reference, but to examine how he engages, analyzes, and writes about poems on a formal level. When engaging a poem or poems from Ward’s collection, make sure to be explicit about how that concept operates in the excerpt you’ve selected.

Responses will be 2 full pages, double spaced, and typed in 12-point Times New Roman font with one inch margins. You should properly cite from both This Can’t Be Life and The Resistance to Poetry, using MLA-format. All essays will be due at the beginning of our class session. No late assignments will be accepted.

For Wednessday, February 27 (the day after our Tuesday class session and before the reading during our Thursday session), you will need to send me an email that contains three questions for Ward based upon her book or our in-class discussions. Not only are writing these questions part of your grade, so is asking them after the reading.

Please email me if you have any questions. Also, please spread the word about Thursday’s reading and invite friends if you would like, as it is open to the public.

Monday, March 18, 2013

UPDATE: 03/18/13

As a reminder, your response essays for Frank Giampietro's Begin Anywhere are due for tomorrow's class session.

On Wednesday, 20 March, please submit three questions to me via email for Frank's reading. Send these to me by noon.

For Thursday, 21 March, in addition to Frank's reading, you will need to bring a two-paragraph, single-spaced sketch of what you plan on writing about for your final research essay. You'll write a full proposal in earnest later in the semester, but this will give me some idea of where your interests lie.

I hope everyone had a terrific Spring Break. See you tomorrow.

Sunday, March 3, 2013

UPDATE: 03/03/13

For our class session on Tuesday, 05 March, please read the Russell Atkins poems on the Deep Cleveland page. Be prepared to discuss them in class.

As I mentioned in my email to you, I will be out of town at the annual AWP Conference in Boston, MA, so our class session on Thursday, 07 March will be canceled.

In preparation for our Research Proposal, though, we will discuss the assignment guidelines in Tuesday class session. The writing parameters can be found below:

RESEARCH PROPOSAL GUIDELINES

DUE: 11 April 2013 (tentative)
POINTS: 20 points

PURPOSE:

I designed the research proposal to orient you to your research focus by asking you to articulate a topic for investigation; it also introduces you to the genre of proposal writing and establishes the relationship between sophisticated use of sources and strong research writing. As Envision mentions in chapter four, the research proposal “provides a…formal structure for developing a project” and acts as a “means of organizing your thoughts in order to help you solidify your topic and move into the next stages of research” (113). The specific information found in a research proposal will be outlined for you in the “Content and Process” section below.

SUBJECT:

While the topic you select for this semester will be related to one of the concepts or collections or poets we studied this semester, the specific trajectory of your project is up to you. Ultimately, though, choose a topic that interests you or appeals to you in some way.

WHAT IS A RESEARCH PROPOSAL:

The foundation of research and writing is discovery, so you should not worry about whether or not you’re your proposal will address exactly what you end up writing about in your final research essay. But the proposal is a type of promise (to yourself and to your instructor) that will guide you through the research process and the development of a research-based argument. In all likelihood, as you conduct your research, your topic will modify in some way; this is perfectly acceptable and, in fact, normal.

A wide variety of disciplines and professions use proposals as a means of developing agendas for research communities, securing funding for studies, publicizing plans for inquiry and field research, and testing the interest of potential audience in a given project. Therefore, the genre, organization, and contents of the research proposal differ in many important ways from other kinds of popular and academic writing (which will be discussed in the “Content and Process” section). In the proposal, you need to explain your interest in your chosen subject and establish a set of questions to guide your inquiry. You also need to create a timeline for your research and writing process, as it is crucial to time management and helping to shape the scope and range of your research.

FORMAT AND LENGTH:

This assignment asks you to try out real-world standards for the length, format, and content of a research proposal, which will prepare you for future academic and professional projects. Your research proposal will be 4-5 pages in length outline your research ideas. The proposal should be double spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, spell-checked and proofread. As this is both a formal project and a graded assignment, make sure that your proposal is more polished than a stream-of-consciousness free-write.

CONTENT AND PROCESS:

1. First, come up with an intriguing title for your research proposal that articulates a spirit of inquiry and engages your audience’s (i.e. your peers and professors) interest.

2. An introduction that clearly states and describes your topic, outlines your purpose, and identifies the conversation you’ve entered. You should develop a working thesis; this tentative statement will help you navigate sources more effectively and assist with time management and navigation of resources. But remember: be prepared to change your thesis as often as an honest interpretation of the data demands.

3. Provide background on your topic and what you know so far. Acknowledging how little you know can be an effective rhetorical move, for it demonstrates your need to conduct research. Of course, you should conduct preliminary research that you will incorporate and properly site in this section. Therefore, please integrate 1-2 reputable and relevant sources in your research proposal.

4. Identify a series of research questions that will inform your project and explain them in your proposal. While you, no doubt, will pose some general questions, make sure that you develop a series of specific and relevant (thus helpful) questions in order to guide and focus your next stage of research.

5. Determine and articulate the purpose or goal of this research: Why are you researching this particular topic? Why do you feel compelled to study this topic further? Whom do you hope to persuade? What is the significance of this work? This last aspect is the most crucial one, and it often makes or breaks the decision of a governing board, financial establishment, or other evaluative audience when judging various proposals of their merit, feasibility, and contribution to the field. You might decide to use this aspect for your conclusion.

6. Create a working bibliography that lists sources you’ve collected so far. Your working bibliography should conform to the documentation system (MLA) specified by your instructor, supervisor, or funding agency.